{"id":699,"date":"2026-02-28T02:42:36","date_gmt":"2026-02-28T02:42:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/?p=699"},"modified":"2026-02-28T02:42:36","modified_gmt":"2026-02-28T02:42:36","slug":"judicial-land-titling-certificate-philippines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/2026\/02\/28\/judicial-land-titling-certificate-philippines\/","title":{"rendered":"Judicial Land Titling Certificate Philippines"},"content":{"rendered":"\"Facebook\"<\/a>\"twitter\"<\/a>\"reddit\"<\/a>\"pinterest\"<\/a>\"linkedin\"<\/a>\"mail\"<\/a>\n

\"What<\/p>\n

Judicial Land Titling (\u2015Certificate of Title\u2016) in the Philippines<\/h2>\n

A comprehensive doctrinal and procedural guide<\/em><\/p>\n

Reader\u2019s note<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 This article is intended for academic and general\u2010information purposes only and must not be relied on as legal advice. For a specific transaction or dispute, always consult counsel or the proper government office.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

1. Historical and Constitutional Setting<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Milestone<\/th>\nKey Idea<\/th>\nRelevance to Judicial Titling<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Regalian Doctrine<\/strong>\u00a0(Art. XII \u00a7 2, 1987 Constitution)<\/td>\n\u201cAll lands of the public domain belong to the State.\u201d<\/td>\nPrivate ownership arises only through a\u00a0grant<\/em>\u00a0or through\u00a0judicial confirmation<\/em>\u00a0of rights that pre-date State ownership.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Land Registration Act No. 496 (1902)<\/strong><\/td>\nIntroduced the Torrens system and the Court of Land Registration.<\/td>\nFirst statute on\u00a0judicial<\/em>\u00a0registration.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Public Land Act No. 141 (1936 codification)<\/strong><\/td>\nGoverns\u00a0administrative<\/em>\u00a0issuance of patents\u00a0and<\/strong>\u00a0the substantive rules for confirmation of imperfect titles.<\/td>\nStill the substantive law for Sec. 14(1) cases.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Property Registration Decree (P.D. 1529, 1978)<\/strong><\/td>\nRe-codified the Torrens system; created the Land Registration Authority (LRA).<\/td>\nToday\u2019s primary procedural charter for\u00a0judicial<\/em>\u00a0registration.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Recent amendments<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 R.A. 9176 (2002), R.A. 10023 (2010), R.A. 11573 (2021)<\/td>\nExtended deadlines for administrative free patents; clarified the cut-off date for possession (12 June 1945) and simplified technical survey requirements.<\/td>\nDo\u00a0not<\/strong>\u00a0change the basic 1945 cut-off for\u00a0judicial<\/em>\u00a0confirmation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\n

2. What Exactly Is \u201cJudicial Land Titling\u201d?<\/h3>\n
    \n
  • Judicial land titling<\/strong>\u00a0is the\u00a0court-based<\/em>\u00a0path to an\u00a0Original Certificate of Title (OCT)<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
  • The end-product of the case is a\u00a0Decree of Registration<\/em>\u00a0issued by the LRA, on the basis of which the Register of Deeds writes the OCT.<\/li>\n
  • Popular shorthand such as \u201cJudicial Land Titling Certificate\u201d actually refers to the OCT born from this process.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Modalities under P.D. 1529<\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Mode<\/th>\nStatutory Basis<\/th>\nTypical Scenario<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    (a) Judicial Confirmation of Imperfect Title<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a7 14 (a) & (b) P.D. 1529 + \u00a7\u00a7 48(b), 122, 123 Pub. Land Act<\/td>\nApplicant (or predecessors) in\u00a0open, continuous, exclusive, and notorious<\/em>\u00a0possession\u00a0since 12 June 1945 or earlier<\/strong>\u00a0of alienable land.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    (b) Cadastral Registration<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a7\u00a7 35-70 P.D. 1529; Cadastral Act No. 2259<\/td>\nGovernment\u2010initiated, area-wide survey where\u00a0all<\/em>\u00a0claimants are summoned; culminates in decrees per lot.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    (c) Confirmation for Conveyances by Spanish Title<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a7 14(1) P.D. 1529<\/td>\nValidation of pre-16 April 1899 Spanish grants. Rare today.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    (d) Reconstitution of Lost\/Destroyed Titles<\/strong><\/td>\nR.A. 26 (as amended)<\/td>\nRestores an OCT\/TCT that already existed.\u00a0Not<\/em>\u00a0an original registration but often confused with it.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
    \n

    3. Who May Apply<\/h3>\n
      \n
    1. Natural persons<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Filipino citizens only (foreigners have no standing except by hereditary succession).<\/li>\n
    2. Juridical persons<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Private domestic corporations with \u2265 60 % Filipino equity may register land \u201cheld in the manner required and for the period prescribed.\u201d<\/li>\n
    3. Co-owners, heirs, guardians, legal representatives<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 must file\u00a0jointly<\/em>\u00a0or in representation of the others when required.<\/li>\n
    4. LGUs\/National Government agencies<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 in their proprietary capacity (e.g., for town sites).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n

      4. Lands Susceptible of Judicial Registration<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
      Requirement<\/th>\nPractical Test<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
      Alienable and Disposable (A & D)<\/strong><\/td>\nCertified as such by the\u00a0DENR-Land Classification Map<\/strong>\u00a0and<\/em>\u00a0a CENRO\/PENRO certification.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Not reserved<\/strong>\u00a0for public use, mineral reservation, timber land, national park, ancestral domain, or military\/naval purpose.<\/td>\nObtain certifications or secure exclusion orders.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Physically identifiable<\/strong>\u00a0by an approved survey.<\/td>\nVerification by DENR-Regional Office and LRA-Technical Staff.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

      Land still\u00a0timber<\/em>\u00a0or\u00a0mineral<\/em>\u00a0in classification can\u00a0never<\/strong>\u00a0ripen into private title, no matter how long the possession.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

      \n

      5. Substantive Requisites for Judicial Confirmation<\/h3>\n
        \n
      1. Possession & Occupation<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Open, continuous, exclusive and notorious (OCEN)\u00a0possession in the concept of owner<\/em>\u00a0since\u00a012 June 1945<\/strong>\u00a0or earlier, or by\u00a0successive tacking<\/em>\u00a0of predecessors.<\/li>\n
      2. Good-faith color of title<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 e.g., tax declarations, private deeds, survey plans, Spanish titles, homestead or sales patents that failed for technical reasons.<\/li>\n
      3. Clear and convincing evidence<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Burden of proof lies on the applicant; Government enjoys the\u00a0presumption of ownership<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        The Supreme Court stresses that \u201cpossession without classification is futile; classification without possession is insufficient.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

        \n

        6. Procedural Roadmap (Rule 132, Rules of Court + P.D. 1529 Ch. III)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        Stage<\/th>\nKey Actions<\/th>\nTime-frames<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
        1. Filing<\/strong><\/td>\nVerified petition (in quadruplicate) + Original Plan (Approved Survey Plan \u2013 AP or Consolidation\/Subdivision Plan) + Supporting documents.<\/td>\nRTC acting as Land Registration Court (LRC) of\u00a0province\/city<\/em>\u00a0where land is situated.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        2. Initial Order & Notice<\/strong><\/td>\nCourt sets\u00a0initial hearing<\/em>; order contains date\/time and depot.*<\/td>\nPublication\u00a0once<\/strong>\u00a0in the Official Gazette\u00a0and<\/strong>\u00a0in a newspaper of general circulation (30 days before initial hearing); posting at city\/municipal hall & barangay; mailing to adjoining owners + Government.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        3. Oppositions<\/strong><\/td>\nMay be filed up to the date of initial hearing; OSG routinely opposes as custodian of the State\u2019s ownership.<\/td>\nFailure to timely oppose results in\u00a0default<\/em>\u00a0but not conclusive.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        4. Presentation of Evidence<\/strong><\/td>\nOral testimonies (surveyor, possessors, adjoining owners); documentary exhibits; formal offer.<\/td>\nContinuous trial preferred; OSG cross-examines.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        5. Decision<\/strong><\/td>\nIf court finds evidence \u201csufficient and satisfactory,\u201d it\u00a0confirms title<\/em>\u00a0and orders issuance of Decree.<\/td>\nDecisions are\u00a0interlocutory<\/em>\u00a0until the Decree is issued.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        6. Decree of Registration<\/strong><\/td>\nClerk transmits records to LRA; LRA Administrator issues the\u00a0Decree<\/em>\u00a0under signature and seal; assigns Original Certificate of Title (OCT) number.<\/td>\nOne-year \u201cperiod of review\u201d starts on date of issuance,\u00a0not<\/strong>\u00a0on date of court decision.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        7. Issuance of OCT<\/strong><\/td>\nRegister of Deeds transcribes Decree into the\u00a0Original Certificate of Title<\/strong>; delivers owner\u2019s duplicate.<\/td>\nTitle becomes\u00a0indefeasible<\/em>\u00a0after the one-year period, subject only to liens and encumbrances noted thereon or to actions for reconveyance based on\u00a0extrinsic fraud<\/em>.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
        \n

        7. Post-Registration Principles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        Doctrine<\/th>\nEffect<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
        Indefeasibility<\/strong><\/td>\nAfter one year, the decree and the OCT are conclusive against\u00a0the world<\/em>\u00a0except when obtained by\u00a0extrinsic fraud<\/em>.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Mirror & Curtain Principles<\/strong><\/td>\nA purchaser in good faith may rely on the face of the title; he need not look \u201cbehind the curtain\u201d except for annotations.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        \u201cOne-Year Rule\u201d vs. Reconveyance<\/strong><\/td>\nAction to annul the\u00a0decree<\/em>\u00a0is barred after one year, but an action for\u00a0reconveyance of the land<\/em>\u00a0based on trust survives for four years from discovery of fraud, but not beyond ten years, and transmutes into\u00a0ejectment<\/em>\u00a0or\u00a0accion reivindicatoria<\/em>\u00a0thereafter.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Extension of mortgages, easements, lease notices<\/strong><\/td>\nRegister of Deeds annotates subsequent transactions on the original and the owner\u2019s duplicate.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Loss\/Destruction<\/strong><\/td>\nReconstituted under R.A. 26 or administrative reconstitution (R.A. 6732 & R.A. 10347).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
        \n

        8. Common Evidentiary Pitfalls<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        Pitfall<\/th>\nIllustrative Case<\/th>\nLesson<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
        Tax declarations\u00a0alone<\/strong><\/td>\nRepublic v. Dizon<\/em>\u00a0(G.R. No. 207029, 31 Aug 2016)<\/td>\nTax receipts are mere indicia, not proof of ownership.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Land classified\u00a0A&D<\/em>\u00a0after<\/strong>\u00a0application<\/td>\nRepublic v. Cortez<\/em>\u00a0(G.R. No. 183656, 13 Apr 2015)<\/td>\nLand must be A&D\u00a0before the filing<\/em>; classification can be proved by an\u00a0official certification and LC Map<\/em>.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Possession only\u00a0since 1948<\/strong><\/td>\nHeirs of Malabanan v. Republic<\/em>\u00a0(G.R. No. 179987, 03 Sept 2013)<\/td>\nCut-off is 12 June 1945, not 30 Dec + 1948 as once allowed under R.A. 9176 for\u00a0administrative<\/em>\u00a0titling.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Reliance on\u00a0Spanish title<\/em>\u00a0older than 16 Apr 1899 but\u00a0never<\/em>\u00a0submitted for confirmation<\/td>\nRepublic v. CA & Naguit<\/em>\u00a0(G.R. No. 144459, 17 Jan 2006)<\/td>\nSpanish title is evidence of\u00a0mode of acquisition<\/em>\u00a0but must still meet OCEN possession or be a \u201ccomposite title.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
        \n

        9. Judicial vs. Administrative Titling \u2013 At a Glance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        Feature<\/th>\nJudicial<\/strong><\/th>\nAdministrative<\/strong>\u00a0(DENR-CENRO\/PENRO)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
        Governing Law<\/td>\nP.D. 1529 \u00a7 14<\/td>\nPub. Land Act \u00a7 45 (Free Patent), R.A. 10023 (Residential Patent), etc.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Decision-maker<\/td>\nRegional Trial Court (acting as LRC)<\/td>\nDENR \u2013 CENRO\/PENRO, confirmed by DENR Regional Director<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Cut-off date for possession<\/td>\n12 June 1945<\/strong><\/td>\nVaried; most patents require 10\u201330 years till\u00a031 Dec 2034<\/strong>\u00a0(R.A. 9176 & R.A. 11573)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Proof of A & D status<\/td>\nDENR certification + LC Map; subject to cross-examination in court<\/td>\nUsually internal DENR validation; no judicial scrutiny<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Appeals<\/td>\nCA\/Romote to SC<\/td>\nOffice of the President, then CA\/SC<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Fees<\/td>\nDocket, publication, survey, Sheriff<\/td>\nMinimal (survey fees often waived in free patents)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Speed<\/td>\n1\u20133 years (ideal)<\/td>\n6 months to 18 months if papers complete<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Output<\/td>\nOriginal Certificate of Title<\/strong>\u00a0(OCT)<\/td>\nPatent<\/strong>\u00a0transmitted to ROD and also becomes OCT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
        \n

        10. Fees & Cost Components (indicative)<\/h3>\n
          \n
        1. Docket fee<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Scale based on assessed (tax declaration) value.<\/li>\n
        2. Publication<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Official Gazette (\u20b1 8,000\u201315,000 for two pages) + Newspaper (<\/del>\u20b1 15,000 +).<\/li>\n
        3. Survey<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Private Geodetic Engineer (\u20b1 10,000\u201340,000 depending on area & terrain).<\/li>\n
        4. LRA filing & decree fee<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 \u20b1 50\/ha (minimum) + annotation fees.<\/li>\n
        5. Register of Deeds entry\/issuance fee<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 \u20b1 500 + valuation increments.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Government agencies and indigent litigants may apply for\u00a0fee exemption<\/strong>\u00a0under P.D. 1529, \u00a7 110.<\/p>\n

          \n

          11. Remedies & Review<\/h3>\n
            \n
          • Aggrieved party<\/strong>\u00a0may appeal the\u00a0decision<\/em>\u00a0within 15 days to the Court of Appeals (ordinary Rule 41 appeal).<\/li>\n
          • Review of the Decree<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 within one year\u00a0before<\/em>\u00a0the LRA and\/or RTC via a petition under P.D. 1529 \u00a7 108 or Rule 64 if the decree was void ab initio.<\/li>\n
          • Annulment\/reconveyance<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 after one year, action lies in RTC\u00a0in equity<\/em>, grounded on extrinsic fraud, forging, or void underlying contract.<\/li>\n
          • Reopening of cadastral decrees<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 R.A. 931 allows reopening within one year from effectivity (very narrow window).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
            \n

            12. Interaction with Special Laws<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
            Special Regime<\/th>\nEffect on Judicial Titling<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
            Indigenous Peoples\u2019 Rights Act (R.A. 8371)<\/strong><\/td>\nAncestral domains\/lands are registered\u00a0administratively<\/em>\u00a0by NCIP; land already titled under Torrens is\u00a0respected<\/em>\u00a0but conflicts go to regular courts.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS, R.A. 11038)<\/strong><\/td>\nLands within proclaimed protected areas are\u00a0non-registrable<\/em>; existing titles are recognized subject to the buffer-zone rules.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Mining Act (R.A. 7942)<\/strong><\/td>\nSurface rights may be titled; mineral rights remain with the State and are merely leased under a Mineral Production Sharing Agreement (MPSA).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Agrarian Reform (R.A. 6657 & R.A. 11953)<\/strong><\/td>\nLand already titled may still be placed under CARP, but DAR certificates of land ownership award (CLOAs) follow a\u00a0separate<\/strong>\u00a0system of titling.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Unified Land Titling Project (under R.A. 11573)<\/strong><\/td>\nOngoing digitalization and \u201cone-time transfer\u201d from OCT to electronic title (e-TCT) with the Registry of Deeds.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
            \n

            13. Practical Checklist for Practitioners<\/h3>\n
              \n
            1. Start with land classification.<\/strong>\u00a0Secure the DENR-CENRO\u00a0A&D certification<\/em>\u00a0and annotate the LC Map number in the petition.<\/li>\n
            2. Vet the chain of possession<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 at least from 1945 to present, synchronize tax declarations every three (3) years, and gather witness-affidavits.<\/li>\n
            3. Check conflicting claims<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 visit barangay records, local assessor, and verify with LRA\u2019s Integrated Title Information System (ITIS).<\/li>\n
            4. Prepare for OSG opposition<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 rehearse witnesses, anticipate questions on possession dates and boundaries.<\/li>\n
            5. Keep track of the\u00a0protocol number<\/em>\u00a0of the survey plan<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 it must match the technical description in the decree.<\/li>\n
            6. After decision, follow up<\/strong>\u00a0at the LRA\u00a0Central Office<\/em>\u00a0(Judicial Confirmation Division) to cut waiting time for the Decree.<\/li>\n
            7. On receipt of OCT, examine\u00a0every annotation line-by-line<\/em>\u00a0before leaving the Registry. Corrections later require a \u00a7 108 petition.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
              \n

              14. Emerging Trends and Reforms<\/h3>\n
                \n
              • Digital Titles (e-Titles)<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 LRA\u2019s Land Titling Computerization Project (LTCP) is rolling out nationwide; newly issued OCTs are now immediately electronic.<\/li>\n
              • E-Court & Videoconferencing<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Many RTCs sitting as LRC accept remote testimonies for surveyors abroad or elderly claimants.<\/li>\n
              • Mobile Land Titling Courts<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Pilot programs in remote areas (e.g., Palawan) shorten publication timelines by bundling petitions.<\/li>\n
              • Judicial Affidavit Rule<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Affidavits now substitute direct testimony, reducing court hearings from three to one.<\/li>\n
              • RA 11573\u2019s simplified survey standards<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Allows\u00a0provisional approval<\/em>\u00a0of plans pending \u201cground-truthing,\u201d expediting the docketing stage.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
                \n

                15. Conclusion<\/h3>\n

                A\u00a0Judicial Land Titling Certificate<\/strong>\u2014the Original Certificate of Title born of judicial confirmation\u2014remains the gold standard of ownership in Philippine real property law. Navigating the path from raw possession to an indefeasible title demands mastery of:<\/p>\n

                  \n
                • Substantive land law<\/strong>\u00a0(Regalian Doctrine, Public Land Act, P.D. 1529),<\/li>\n
                • Procedural rigor<\/strong>\u00a0(publication, notice, evidence), and<\/li>\n
                • Meticulous, paper-heavy compliance<\/strong>\u00a0with survey and registry rules.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                  Yet, for claimants whose possession antedates 12 June 1945 and whose parcels have been declared alienable, judicial titling provides\u00a0permanent security<\/em>\u2014shielding land against overlapping claims, providing marketability for mortgages and sales, and entrenching the Torrens system\u2019s promise that \u201conce registered, never again insecure.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                  Judicial Land Titling (\u2015Certificate of Title\u2016) in the Philippines A comprehensive doctrinal and procedural guide Reader\u2019s note\u00a0\u2013 This article is intended for academic and general\u2010information purposes only and must not be relied on as legal advice. For a specific transaction or dispute, always consult counsel or the proper government office. 1. Historical and Constitutional Setting […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/699"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=699"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/699\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":701,"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/699\/revisions\/701"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alexi.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}